plato vs. socrates :: essays research papers

Plato vs. Aristotle     Plato and Aristotle, dickens very well known philosophers, by commentary are knowledge lovers, who held different ways of thinking on that of creation, politics, and love, wherefore the teacher of Aristotle, who was Plato, holds different views on all of those matters.      Creation, the beginning process of action either given from God, or an actual higher form which was Platos idea, or passed through from evolution, from which Aristotle sided with is one example of their differences. Platos idea that the creator, was a God, the all powerful who created the Earth, the universe, ECT, Aristotle would not believe in such a affair, because in his way of thinking, he does not encourage something that isnt visual to him. Substance, matter, substratum, plain black and white evidence of something in the only win over barrier for Aristotles mind to handle, whereas Plato trusted quite the opposite.     &nbs pPolitics for these two resembles night and day. Aristotle preached balance. In balance, a stable government can be observed and obtained. Platos concept of what politics and government should be is a station result of his belief in the theory of forms. The theory of forms basically states that thither is a higher "form" for everything that exists in the world. Each material thing is a representation of the real thing which is the form. According to Plato, most concourse cannot fulfil the forms they only see their representation or their shadows.     Love for Plato had to be accomplished through mind and soul. For him, and his idea the mind and soul could not be separated, either through mortality or immortality. Someone could not love without body or a soul. To Aristotle we are of substance. cardinal cannot see a soul, nor detect a mind, or where it lies, therefore to Aristotle, it does not exist. One cannot see love, it does not have fire, flesh or a crack.all aspects of matter that are defined of what everything living is.      In conclusion, my idea of what the precedent politics is, which I know cannot be obtained is where the people are respected. No irresponsibility of what the people want carried through, to get dropped, or forgotten or even just not even considered. We live in a society where we have lost touch with what matters, what the democracy is set for, what it stands for as Americans. My view on love is that it exists.