Diaoyu Island Dispute

lacquerese c all in all the island group near as Senkaku Islands whereas Chinese call these islands as Diaoyu Islands. For many years, the devil countries save been arguing who the s allwhereeignty of the islands is, besides so far, they do non concord any determi soil who should possess the islands. This year, at April, the governor of capital of Japan, Shintaro Ishihara organizes a event to refund in order to buy the Diaoyu Islands of japan. Later on the government reappearance over the event, they try to change the Islands.The above action course just ab extinct Hongkongers went to the islands and precious to tell the world that Diaoyu Island belongs to chinaware. later the incident, many Chinese, including those who live in China and Taiwan, came out and had mass demonstration. Due to this unexpected event, this sensitive topic becomes the major(ip) discussion between the government of Chinese and japan. When we want to discuss this issue, we should brainstorm into the history of the islands. Diaoyu island was first recorded on the Chinese book travel with a Tail Wind. Since then, the Ming and Qing Dynasty were controlling the islands until 1895.After the First Sino- Nipponese War, concord to the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895, the Taiwan islands and its islands group were ceded to japan, but the treaty didnt include Diaoyu Islands. However, Diaoyu islands were facilitate being controlled by the proud lacquer and became a fortune of Ryukyu Islands. After WWII, according to the Supreme Commander for the altogetheried Powers Instruction Note, No. 677 For the part of this directive, Japan is defined to include the four main islands of Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Kyushu and Shikoku) and the nigh 1,000 smaller adjacent islands.The territories of Japan pass on only be the 4 main islands and 1,000 small islands, which were non included Diaoyu Island. However, after the WWII round(prenominal) the body politic of China and the Peoples Republ ic of China did not stand for Diaoyu islands as a part of the Chinese territory. In 1972, when the Unites States handover Ryukyu Islands came back to Japan, they similarly handovered the administrative jurisdiction of Diaoyu Island to the Japan government. Owing to the above historical background, both countries, China and Japan, believe in their own mutation about the reign of the islands and ref exercise the others adaptation.To understand political as federal agency in the Diaoyu islands dis delegatee, Countries that involved Chinese, Japan and Unites States has exhibit different lookings of power. In the face of Power as decision-making This face of power consists of conscious actions that in some way influence the heart of decisions. , use Chinese as an example, when ein truth time japan wants to do anything related to the sovereign of Diaoyu Island, like circumstance up a lighthouse, sending some scientist to Islands, or even recently, nationalize the islands, Chinese government get out use in that respect power to excise the Nipponese government.Look the action that takes in this time, Chinese tightening customs inspections from Japan as a kind of economic sanctions towards japan. And also many of Chinese traveler cancelled their trip to Japan, lead curb a abundant hit to the Japan tourism. With these actions, the Chinese government showed their power to influence the content of decisions. The other face of power is Power as agenda put, the ability to strict to set or controls the political agenda. Treaty of mutual Cooperation and Security between the Unites States and Japan make sure that if some countries have conflict or at war with Japan, the Unites States leave alone help to protect the Japan. So it makes that the Chinese cant have a very strong action to fight for the Diaoyu islands. The protection promised by the Unites States to the Nipponese, actually set up a line that stop Chinese government to take a further action on f ighting back at that place right. What makes the Chinese or the Japanese believe in their own version about the sovereignty of the islands in dispute and reject that of the Japanese or the Chinese?As the sociologist Max Weber defined that, sovereignty is a communitys monopoly on the legitimate use of force. From the Chineses viewpoint, Chinese ever restate that Diaoyu islands belong to China since the ancient time. They believe their own version because since 1403, the book Voyage with a Tail Wind, and the book Record of the purplish Envoys Visit to Ryukyu in 1534 is the very first record of the islands. Since then, the Chinese Imperial Map of Ming determine Island group name as Diaoyu, which mean fishing is Chinese and these advance prove that Diaoyu islands should be a part of China.Also as even it is not a part of ceded lands of Treaty of Shimonoseki but according to Potsdam Declaration japan should give up the control of all islands excerpt for the islands of Honshu, Hokka ido, Kyushu, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine. The Chinese government believes that Japan is now illegally to control the island, so Diaoyu Islands should be handovered back to China. On the other hand, In the Japanese point of view, although Diaoyu islands were found by Chinese, the islands were not arrangeively governed by the Chinese government.Also after the sign of Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895, even though the control of Diaoyu islands wasnt covered in the treaty, the Japanese has already effectively governed the islands. Moreover, after WWII, according to the Treaty of Peace with Japan, The Unites States temporarily take the control of the Ryukyu Islands. As Diaoyu islands are a part of the Ryukyu Islands, when Unites States handovered Ryukyu Islands to japan, Chinese government didnt disagree, so Diaoyu Islands should be remain as a part of Japanese.However, the reason I think that why Japanese/Chinese reject others version, is mainly because the Diaoyu island s problem is not just patently the sovereign of a land. According to the United Nations Convention on the virtue of the Sea, Exclusive economic zones (EEZs) extend from the edge of the territorial sea out to 200 nautical miles from the baseline. Within this area, the coastal nation has sole growth rights over all natural resources. Base on this law, if Diaoyu islands are rightfully a part of japan, the EEZ of Japan go away be very reason out to the coast of Taiwan and Mainland.This leave behind definitely affect the economic engross of China. Furthermore, in 1969, the United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (ECAFE) identified a gigantic among of authorization oil and throttle valve reserves in the vicinity of the Diaoyu Islands. If who control there, that country will have the long-term push source. As Japan itself doesnt have enough resources for it own use, that huge amount of resources should be very attractive to Japan. So the dispute is not jus t the sovereign or nationalism. I believe the dispute will be resolved politically instead of militarily.First, if Japan and Chinese use there military power to resolved the dispute, the economic and both county will be damaged. War is an event that consumes a lot of recourses, money, fuel, food and so forth A country has to put itself to prepare the war as a result the country will put lack affect on other area of event. The economic of Japan was in a downswing of many years a war for Japan whitethorn give them a big hit which they cant handle. As the effect of globalization, on the other hand, if Japan economic collapse, the Chinese economic will also be damage.On the other hand, although ECAFE identified a huge among of potential oil and gas reserves in the vicinity of the Diaoyu Islands, military action, or war take a lot of resources. Even we know that there may be so much potential oil and gas under Diaoyu islands, but it may actually not deserve to put money on the unknowabl e resources. In the stance of global relation, Chinese will not indicate a war to Japan, as the Unites States will involve in the war. In 1960, Japan signed Treaty of plebeian Cooperation and Security between the Unites States and Japan with Unites States.The treaty stated that Either side get military approach shot on the territory of Japan controls will be deemed to endanger the safety of the other. In the dispute of Diaoyu Islands the Assistant writing table of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs restated that Diaoyu Islands were under the Japans effective control, the treaty will protect it. It means that, if the PLA attack or occupied the islands, according to the treaty, Unites States have it right to send there troops and participate the war. Chinese government may not have power to fight the country with strongest military power.As the result, Chinese also will resolve the problem militarily. In this dispute, we can see the nationalism introduced in both countries. On China, after those Hongkongers landed on the Diaoyu Islands, and captured by the Japan Coast Guard. Many different cities in China started to many give to oppose Japaneses action. How every these huge demonstrate soon became Irrational violence, people damage cars that made from japan, rob restaurants or stores that related to Japanese, even it was owned by Chinese. Some of these thugs even time-tested to damage or even enter the Embassy of Japan.Also I this time of demonstrate, the slogans that utilise were no longer just about Not to buy, but somethings like War with Japan Step in to Tokyo But the strangest thing is that, these slogans were seen at different cities, but not one. All these were like planned to happen. The above cases can be seen as some kind of expansionist nationalism, as these actions tend to project another nation/race as an enemy. On Japan, after the landing of Hongkongers, 50 members of the Japanese Right-wing politics group included 8 member of baili wick Die landed Diaoyu Island again to restates the Japan sovereign of there.On the other hand, these Japanese Right-wing politics group also organize a demonstrate to oppose Chineses action, similar to the one in China, they all clam that the Islands are their land, and they are not welcome the Chinese. Also on both countries Internet forum, we can see a lot of brook or comments about the dispute. Many of those incite the hatred between two races, this also one of example that we can see the expansionist nationalism. propagation Xiang, D. (1961). Liang zhong hai dao zhen jing. Beijing Zhonghua shu ju. Pp. 253 SCAPIN677 Wikisource, the free online library. (2012, April 2).Retrieved November 25, 2012, from http//en. wikisource. org/wiki/SCAPIN677 Heywood, A. (2007). Politics. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 11 China tightening customs inspections from Japan. (2012, kinfolk 21). Retrieved November 26, 2012, version http//www. channelnewsasia. com/stories/afp_asiapacific_busin ess/view/1227266/1/. html Islands dispute with China may hurt Japanese tourism recovery. (2012, family 16). Retrieved November 26, 2012, form http//www. eturbonews. com/31190/islands-dispute-china-may-hurt-japanese-tourism-recovery ( ). (2012, September 25). Retrieved November 25, 2012, from http//news. inhuanet. com/2012-09/25/c_113202698. htm UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE sea . (2012). Retrieved November 26, 2012, from http//www. un. org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx. htm . (2012, September 21). Retrieved November 25, 2012, from https//www. youtube. com/ suck in? v=FtwgBDLx8Vg . (2012, Augest 19). Retrieved November 25, 2012, from http//www. bbc. co. uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2012/08/120819_japan_diaoyu_landing. shtml 1 . Xiang, D. (1961). Liang zhong hai dao zhen jing. Beijing Zhonghua shu ju. Pp. 253 2 .SCAPIN677 Wikisource, the free online library. (2012, April 2). Retrieved November 25, 2012, from http//en. wikisource. org/wiki/SCAPIN 677 3 . Heywood, A. (2007). Politics. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 11 4 . China tightening customs inspections from Japan. (2012, September 21). Retrieved November 26, 2012, form http//www. channelnewsasia. com/stories/afp_asiapacific_business/view/1227266/1/. html 5 . Islands dispute with China may hurt Japanese tourism recovery. (2012, September 16). Retrieved November 26, 2012, form http//www. eturbonews. com/31190/islands-dispute-china-may-hurt-japanese-tourism-recovery 6 . ( ). (2012, September 25). Retrieved November 25, 2012, from http//news. xinhuanet. com/2012-09/25/c_113202698. htm 7 . UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA . (2012). Retrieved November 26, 2012, from http//www. un. org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx. htm 8 . . (2012, September 21). Retrieved November 25, 2012, from https//www. youtube. com/watch? v=FtwgBDLx8Vg 9 . . (2012, Augest 19). Retrieved November 25, 2012, from http//www. bbc. co. uk/zhongwen/trad/wor ld/2012/08/120819_japan_diaoyu_landing. shtml