Can Skepticism Be Defended, Perhaps In A Limited Form? Essay -- essays

Can Skepticism Be Defended, Perhaps In A Limited Form?1. IntroductionThis essay centres around what it means to have it off something is trustworthy and also whyit is important to distinguish between what you whop and do not or cease not get along.The sceptic in challenging the possibility of knowing anything challenges thebasis on which all epistemology is based. It is from this dishonor on epistemologythat the defence of skepticism is nattern.2. Strong ScepticismStrong scepticism states that it is not possible to know anything. That is wecannot have absolute knowledge of anything. This can however immediately havethe reflexive argument turned on it and have the header begged of it If itis not possible to know anything then(prenominal) how is it you know that nothing isknowable ?. Strong Scepticism is therefore unable to be defended.3. A Definition of KnowledgeKnowledge can be verbalize to be information that the brain has received that meets acertain raise of criteria. When some star states that they know something they moldinessalso conceptualize that, that something is so. If they did not believe in it then howcould they take it in as knowledge ?, they would kinda be doubtful of it andlook for evidence or confession as to why they should believe it.Secondly for someone to believe in something they must also believe that it is honest. If they did not believe that it was true then what is mentioned to a higher placewould not occur.So, so far it is decided that knowledge should be true belief. How does one cometo the conclusion that something is true however ?. We seek justification. Thejustification really is the most important part of the criteria because withoutit one cannot say something is true and therefore cannot say that one believes.This does however bring up the question of how does something become justified ?,do we hear it from other people ?, see it on the news ?. The justification ofsomething really depends on its predictability . If something becomes predictablethen it can becomes justified aswell. For example, I know that the sun will turntomorrow is a fair thing to say because I believe this is so, I believe this istrue, and I am justified in accept this due to my past experience* of thepredictableness of the sun rising each day.The tho problem with meeting the set of criteria laid out above is that onemust use one senses to do so and as shall be shown ... ...Britain Methuen & Co.Ltd.Dancy, Jonathon (1985), An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology, large(p)Britain Basil Blackwell Ltd.Descartes, Rene (as translated by E.S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross) (1969), The philosophic flora of Decartes vol. I - II, Cambridge Cambridge UniversityPress.Edwards, Paul (1965), The Logic of Moral Discourse, New York The Free Press.Gorovitz, Williams (1967), Philosophical Analysis, An Introduction to ItsLanguage & Techniques, New York Random House.Guthrie, W. K. C. (1971), The Sophists, Cambridge Cambridge Universit y Press.Hamlyn, D. W. (1983), The Theory of Knowledge, London Macmillan Press.Harris, Errol (1969), rudiments of Philosophy - A Study of Classical Texts,U.S.A. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Harrison, J. (1966-67). A Philosophers Nightmare or The Ghost not Laid.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol LXVII.Hume, David (1962), A Treatise of Human Nature, Great Britain Fontana Library.Presley, C. F. (1967), The Identity Theory of Mind, St Lucia University ofQueensland Press.van Inwagen, P. and Lowe E. (1996) . Why Is There Anything At every(prenominal)?. Proceedingsof the Aristotelian Society, Vol LXX.